There are a lot of movements have a very different background, move the democracy in Egypt and lead the democracy in Egypt. We have Islamist Muslim Brotherhood – Islamist, I mean Salafist Muslim Brotherhood, lefts, liberal, independent movement like 6 of April movement. And all of them during the revolution they are very united, very united. They arrange everything, they arrange demonstrations, they arrange marches, they arrange the – how to get food and drinks for the people who fight with the – with the police and and people who sit in Tahrir Square. After the revolution – and they did it with – a choice. They get the dream with – a choice.
After the revolution some of the movements separate of the others like Islamists and the Muslim Brotherhood – they have their own goals. Muslim Brotherhood – they want to lead Egypt to some specific area to be an Islamic-moderated state. Islamists need Egypt to be like Saudi Arabia – Islamist state. Others like lefts and liberals, they need Egypt – maybe lefts, they need Egypt to be socialist, and liberals need capitalist, and the independent group and the human rights activist need just government and the regime respect human rights and respect human rights and to respect the human and to respect Egyptians.
Actually who have a very power in the streets is the Islamists. It’s a fact. They have very good power in the streets. And who have a very clear vision and a very good vision to me is the liberal, but they haven’t the power in the – in the street. Now after the revolution we had a parliament elections and Muslim Brotherhood run the election and the Islamists run the election and some of liberal run the election. And they have very – they haven’t our own point of views – you haven’t our own goal. Everyone look at Egypt as – Muslim Brotherhood look at Egypt as their model. Islamist is the same, and liberal the same.
I think after the revolutions, the united we had before the revolution, it’s gone. It’s like, you know, 18 days into Tahrir Square like a dream for me. It’s – it will never had it again, you know. No united between Islamists, Muslim Brotherhood and other currents because now Muslim Brotherhood and Islamists into power. They lead the parliament. Other powers – leftists, liberals, human rights activists, freedom of expression groups – they are united. They are the only united. They are very little groups try to affect the society and lead the society to freedom, real freedom.
But the Muslim in this issue – you can see that the Muslim and the Islamist are very far from the other movements. They now in the power and they have a very good relation with the military. They want to protect it and protect their power. That’s the situation in democracy. Maybe the democracy gets some Islamists in the parliament, but I believe that democracy will get liberals and who believe in human rights and the freedom of expression and the freedom of religion in the parliament. So no unite between Islamists and other groups – other groups is very different background – leftist, liberals – who believe in capitalism, who believe in socialism. A lot of different, but they have one goal they need state believe in human rights and believe in freedom. So that’s the difference between movements.
Namees Arnous is a well-known television reporter and civil society activist in Egypt. During the Egyptian Revolution, Namees was asked to spread inaccurate stories by El Mehwar Television, her employer. When Namees used social media to publicize the channel’s stance against the Revolution, she was characterized as being a foreign agent and receiving money from foreign governments. She resigned from El Mehwar.
Namees then founded a new media production company which includes television, radio and social media outlets. She aims to promote human rights and democratic principles by training individuals in new media. She is currently working on a project to produce a new television program aimed at Egyptian women, focusing on issues of concern to them.
Namees has worked on a number of civil society campaigns. These include the Change Your Life Campaign, which aims to encourage women to be independent and the Be Free Campaign, which addresses young Muslim women extremists.
She worked on a civic journalism campaign to cover youth participation in elections in their respective regions. The campaign was broadcast on her NGO’s radio station and website.
Namees was among the inaugural group of the George W. Bush Institute’s Women’s Initiative Fellowship Program in 2012, a leadership program designed to empower and equip women to catalyze change.
Namees has her Bachelor’s degree in Mass Communication with a focus on Television and Radio.
With a history dating back to the 10th millennium B.C., Egypt has long played a central role in the Middle East. Egypt is the largest Arab nation and has an influential voice in Arabic and Middle Eastern culture. Egypt has a diverse economy, but has struggled to create sustained economic growth and opportunities for its population of 84 million people.
The country has little experience with representative democracy. From 1956 to 1970, President Gamal Abdel Nasser ruled Egypt with a strong hand, nationalizing the Suez Canal and taking the country into conflict with the new state of Israel. Upon his death, Anwar al-Sadat became president. Together with other Arab nations, Sadat launched the October War against Israel in 1973. In 1979, Sadat signed a groundbreaking peace treaty with Israel.
From Sadat’s assassination in 1981 until the 2011 Egyptian Revolution, Egypt was governed by President Hosni Mubarak. For all of Mubarak’s time in office, and for much of the time since his resignation, Egypt has been under “Emergency Law,” which allows the government to suspend constitutional rights, including limiting political activity and restricting free speech. Emergency Law also allows the government to use summary arrests against political opponents.
For four successive terms, Mubarak was reelected in referenda without an opponent. In 2005, under domestic and international pressure, Mubarak proposed a constitutional amendment to allow Egypt’s first multicandidate presidential elections. Because the amendment would have imposed severe restrictions on the eligibility of opposition candidates, opposition groups boycotted the vote. Mubarak claimed to have won the September 2005 presidential election with an official 88 percent of the vote, amid widespread allegations of fraud and vote rigging. The main opposition leader, Ayman Nour, was subsequently prosecuted by the government for forging signatures on petitions and was sentenced to five years in prison, provoking protests from the United States and other democratic countries.
Following the example of the Tunisian Revolution, large protests swept Egypt in early 2011. The military, led by the Supreme Council of the Armed Forces (SCAF), withdrew its support of Mubarak. On February 11, 2011, Vice President Omar Suleiman announced that Mubarak had resigned. The Supreme Council of the Armed Forces (SCAF) headed by Field Marshal Mohamed Hussein Tantawi then assumed power in Egypt. SCAF dissolved the parliament and suspended the constitution.
In November 2011, Egypt held parliamentary elections that were reportedly fair and democratic. In June 2012, Muslim Brotherhood leader Mohamed Morsi was elected President, in part because liberal and secular forces failed to coalesce around a single candidate. Morsi’s popularity declined as he declared his orders immune from challenge, removed judicial review processes, and was accused of taking steps towards the implementation of Islamist policies. Conflict arose between those supporting Islamist policies and those seeking a more liberal and secular government. Protests occurred throughout his presidency until Morsi was ousted by the military in July 2013. Muslim Brotherhood leaders were arrested and their camps and offices raided. Until new elections are held, a SCAF-installed provisional government led by acting President Adly Mansour is in control.
In its most recent report, the independent watchdog group Freedom House classifies Egypt as “partly free.” On its scale where 1 is the most free and 7is the least free, Egypt earned scores of 5 in both the civil liberties and political rights categories.
See all Egypt videos