×

Fill out the brief form below for access to the free report.

  • George W. Bush Institute

    Our Ideas

  • Through our three Impact Centers — Domestic Excellence, Global Leadership, and our Engagement Agenda — we focus on developing leaders, advancing policy, and taking action to solve today’s most pressing challenges.

I'm interested in dates between:
--

Taking Action

Advancing Policy

Developing Leaders

Issues

I have minutes to read today:

Programs & Issues

Taking Action

Advancing Policy

Developing Leaders

Issues

Publication Type
Date
I'm interested in dates between:
--
Reading Time

I have minutes to read today:

North Korea is Facing a Food Shortage, Should We Help?

April 8, 2019 by Lindsay Lloyd
The United Nations World Food Programme (WFP) announced that North Korea is again facing food shortages and called for the lifting of some economic sanctions to provide humanitarian relief.

The United Nations World Food Programme (WFP) announced that North Korea is again facing food shortages and called for the lifting of some economic sanctions to provide humanitarian relief.

A combination of bad weather and an inefficient and corrupt economic system has made North Korea’s inability to feed its people a perennial problem, most notoriously in the 1990s, when hundreds of thousands and perhaps millions died of starvation.

In the two decades since the great famine, some things have changed.  While the country has remained a brutal dictatorship, now under the control of a third generation of tyrants from the Kim family, the economy has become somewhat more open.  Black markets known as jangmadang have sprung up because the regime has failed to provide food for its people. For North Koreans with the means, the market has become an important source of nourishment.

The United States has placed a variety of economic sanctions on North Korea for its horrendous human rights record and its ongoing drive to secure nuclear weapons. Internationally, many countries have also stepped up their own economic sanctions.  While the sanctions haven’t been airtight, they have had an impact, even though China continues to be Pyongyang’s most solid supporter and trading partner.

How should the United States and others respond to the WFP’s call for assistance? 

It may surprise many to learn that the U.S. government (and private charities) have provided aid to North Korea in the past.  According to the nonpartisan Congressional Research Service, between 1995 and 2008, the U.S. government supplied more than $1.3 billion in assistance, about half of which was food.  Assistance largely ceased after North Korea violated the terms of the Six-Party Talks, which placed limits on the nuclear program in exchange for economic assistance.

In my view, the United States should join with others to address human suffering, putting politics aside wherever possible.  But as with everything related to North Korea, it’s not as simple as putting food on a plane and sending it there.  Historically, when the United States and other donors have sent relief supplies to North Korea, once it arrives, it goes solely to the elites.  Those with political clout or the military have had first claim on food, medicine, and other supplies from abroad.

North Korea has always resisted the ability of foreign public and private donors to monitor humanitarian assistance.  Without international monitoring – which is commonplace everywhere else in the world – there is no way to know if assistance is actually helping those most in need. 

This would seem to be a golden opportunity for President Donald Trump, who often speaks of his strong relationship with Dictator Kim Jong-Un.  If indeed the two have established a rapport, the president should pressure his friend to pledge to allow some sort of international monitoring of assistance.

Even without such a guarantee, I believe we should try to help.  Every human life is precious.  And over the long term, we must continue to press for real change and reform in North Korea.  Ultimately, we will only resolve North Korea’s strategic threat when it begins to abide by international standards of human rights and how to treat its people.  Only then will North Korea be able to develop economically and dependably provide for its people’s needs.


Author

Lindsay Lloyd
Lindsay Lloyd

Lindsay Lloyd is the Director of the Human Freedom Initiative at the George W. Bush Institute, where he manages original research and programmatic efforts to advance freedom and democracy in the world. Lindsay currently leads the Bush Institute’s Freedom in North Korea project, which raises awareness of human rights violations in North Korea, proposes new policy solutions, and engages leaders to help improve the lives of the North Korean people.  Lindsay is also responsible for managing the Freedom Collection, a multimedia archive that documents the stories of nonviolent freedom advocates from around the word. 

Prior to joining the Bush Institute, Lindsay served for 16 years at the International Republican Institute (IRI), most recently as senior advisor for policy.   Previously, he was IRI’s regional director for Europe and co-director of the regional program for Central and Eastern Europe, which was based in Slovakia.  At IRI, Lindsay worked with candidates, elected officials, political parties, and civil society activists to develop lasting democratic institutions.

Before joining IRI, Lindsay worked for several members and the leadership of the U.S. House of Representatives, as political director for a political action committee, and for Jack Kemp’s 1988 presidential campaign. He graduated from Georgetown University’s School of Foreign Service. 

Full Bio

Up Next:

Recent Reads from the Bush Center on April 5, 2019