Fill out the brief form below for access to the free report.
In honor of the Iranian people who once again were denied free and fair elections, the Freedom Collection blog is highlighting Iran this week. We have asked a number of leaders in the democracy promotion community to answer the following questions:
Where is Iran on its path toward liberalization? And is the demise of the clerical regime a necessary prerequisite for democratization?
We will be posting responses throughout the week.
In the wake of the surprisingly large victory by centrist candidate Hussein Rowhani in Iran’s recent presidential election, it is a good time to revisit the legacy of the 2009 Green Movement and the woman who embodied it for many – Neda Agha-Soltan. Her brutal death at the hands of a sniper, presumed to be from the regime, became the symbol of the clash between the Iranian theocracy’s grim determination to bend that society to their will, and the more hopeful aspirations of millions of young Iranian women and men to make free choices about both their own lives and the future of their country.
On the surface, the clerics remain firmly in charge of Iran’s political system and the Green Movement seems to have fallen fall short in its calls for political change. The Guardian Council – the clerical body that makes the final determination on whether candidates are sufficiently Islamic – again barred women from running for president, and the basij (morality police) was out in full force prior to the elections. Women are still subjected to horrific abuses, and rights advocates such as Asieh Amini are endlessly harassed. Iran’s most famous human and women’s rights activist, Dr. Shirin Ebadi, remains exiled in London while her husband is barred from leaving Tehran. And leading figures from the Green Movement remain imprisoned or under house arrest.
But while the Green Movement failed to achieve its immediate goals, there has been a definite change in how the Iranian regime is responding to the demands of its impatient and unhappy electorate. Moderates and reformers – including women – strategically coalesced around Rowhani and turned out in high numbers to ensure his victory. The regime has allowed the results to stand, raising hopes that reforms may be forthcoming. While Rowhani is a regime insider, he was alone among the candidates in talking about the need to end an “era of extremism” and improve relations with the West – another theme that women interviewed before the elections identified as important. Since their support was critical to Rowhani’s margin of victory in this election, the impatience of women and youth with the status quo will continue to put pressure on him and the regime.
Nevertheless, the continued dominance of the ultraconservative clerics ensures that even if Rowhani wants to pursue reforms, he must operate within a system that mercilessly represses women in the name of religion and places the narrow views of a few old men above the dreams of the rest of the country. But Neda’s dream – of personal and political freedoms, equality under the law and in daily life, and a government to be proud of – remains relevant for millions of women and men in Iran. For now they are showing patience and trying move toward this dream through the ballot box, but they have shown in the past they are willing to pay a higher price in the pursuit of liberty.
Kelley Currie is a special contributor to the Freedom Collection blog. Kelley is a Senior Fellow with the Project 2049 Institute. Prior to joining the Institute, Kelley served as an advisor to Under Secretary of State for Democracy and Global Affairs.
Chinese Prisoner’s Death Holds a Message for Americans and China
Liu Xiaobo, China’s most prominent dissident and Nobel Peace Prize winner died this week. His death holds a message for Americans and for China.
Release of Chinese Political Prisoner a Timely Reminder to Support Freedom Advocates Abroad
More than half the world’s population still lives in countries where basic political rights and civil liberties are only partly respected, if at all.
Bringing Freedom to the Forefront of 21st Century Politics
Is the global liberal democratic order in danger? Purposefully constructed in the aftermath of World War II, this order -- and the American leadership that is central to its success --has contributed to securing peace and expanding prosperity in the United States and around the world. Today, that order appears to be dissolving. This crisis is not new or sudden; it has been mounting for several years. Global challenges like authoritarian capitalism, violent extremism, demographic pressures, and displaced populations have placed global freedom in decline. Fraying traditional alliances united by core values of freedom are increasingly weak to respond. It is alarming that the downdraft in democratic resilience over the past decade or more includes countries that have long been part of the consolidated democratic West. This is democratic deconsolidation. In much of the Western world, we see a rise in demagogic populism, illiberalism, nationalism, protectionism, and waning conf
The Importance of Speaking Truth to Tyrants
What the president of the United States says matters. Even during the realpolitik policies of détente under Richard Nixon, it was still clear that American policy was based on a set of core values. Nixon’s practical goals of reaching deals with America’s adversaries was never based on the “great chemistry” with himself or praising the Soviet or Communist Chinese leadership doing a “fantastic job.” When the president aligns himself with the autocrats and dictators, he aligns America with their oppression. He sends a message that corruption and brutality are not our concern. Contrast that with how Ronald Reagan defied much of world opinion in calling out the brutality of the Soviet system. Natan Sharansky, then a refusenik imprisoned in a Soviet gulag, later wrote for the Weekly Standard of his thoughts on Reagan’s pronouncement that the USSR was an evil empire: “It was the great, brilliant moment whe