Back to all interviews
Freedom Collection

Interviews with Tutu Alicante

Interviewed January 4, 2011

There is a famous saying by Lord Acton: Power corrupts; absolute power corrupts absolutely. Equatorial Guinea is a clear example where absolute power has corrupted the government absolutely. Laws are important because they offer a parameter, a space within which we human beings can operate and act and interact with each other. And in the case of a nation, laws are quintessential in guiding the powers of the state, the powers of agents of the state and the powers of the people who are ruled or governed by that government. Rule of law – without rule of law in a place like Equatorial Guinea, you end up with a government that uses assets of the state as if they were their own and no one can demand any accountability.

I’ll give you an anecdote. President Obiang in 2008 made a donation to UNESCO, $3 million donation, to create an award named after him, to honor science and technology. [After public pressure, UNESCO later renamed the award the UNESCO-Equatorial Guinea International Prize for Research in the Life Sciences.] The check given to UNESCO came from the Ministry of Treasury of Equatorial Guinea. Obiang reported the donation as coming from the Obiang Nguema Mbasogo Foundation.

When we contacted UNESCO and told them that an award named after Obiang, supposedly with money from his foundation, which up to that point did not exist, is only going to legitimize a horrible dictator in the eyes of the world, and it took UNESCO three years to figure out that what we’re saying is true. Yet in the end, that award was just approved in March of 2011– in 2012. Just three – two months ago.

Why was it approved? Because President Obiang had the money to lobby enough governments from African countries, the Middle East and a few others in Latin America, namely Venezuela, Cuba and Brazil, to win the vote once they got to UNESCO, you know. And this is one of those situations where if we had laws inside the country that could guarantee that a president cannot use money from the public treasury to create an award or to make a donation, that could have been stopped.