Back to all interviews
Freedom Collection

Interviews with Jestina Mukoko

Interviewed May 4, 2011

I thank my fearless lawyer who, against even my family – because I think all my family wanted to hear was that I’d been granted bail, but she insisted there were applications and things she needed to do as a lawyer, which, if she did not do, she would be questioned in the future in terms of what she had done for me. And so she made an application to challenge the fact that I was abducted, the fact that I was tortured and the fact that I was not protected by the law. And we were seeking for it to be referred to the constitutional court.

And at that time, my family was really up in arms that they were tired of all these applications and all they wanted to hear was a bail application. And my lawyer asked me to talk to them. I spoke to them and made them understand that it was important that these applications take their course. The case was referred to the constitutional court. And it was heard in the constitutional court in June 2009. And on September 28, 2009, the constitutional court, which is known as the Supreme Court in Zimbabwe, ruled that they unanimously agreed on the bench that my rights had been violated by the state through its agents, and as a result, there was going to be a permanent stay of criminal prosecution.

And that’s how I was cleared of all the crime that I had been accused of. But then even after the end of the case, I think things have lingered on. And I think even up to now there are times when I think about what I went through. But at least for now, I don’t think about it as why me, why did it have to be me? I think I have changed from that position and recognize that probably there was a reason why I had to go through the pain that I went through.