Back to all interviews
Freedom Collection

Interviews with Genaro Arriagada

Interviewed May 20, 2024

My problem with [President Salvador] Allende’s government (I wrote a book on the subject) was that if you take the statements of the parties that supported Salvador Allende, it is not true that they wanted to create a second model of socialism, different from Lenin’s and from that of the Soviet Union, that would be characterized by the combination of democracy and socialism.

[Salvador Allende (1908-1973) was president of Chile between 1970 and 1973. He was removed from office in a military coup d’état. Vladimir Ilyich Ulyanov (Lenin) (1870 –1924) was a Russian communist revolutionary, politician and political theorist.]

The Chilean Communist Party was the most pro-Soviet of the world’s communist parties. The Socialist Party was to the left of the Chilean Communist Party. Consequently, we had well-founded reasons to think that if they managed to gain power, we would have a dictatorship of the proletariat.

That is in declarations of both parties – the Communist and Socialist Parties. As such, my problem with Allende’s government was not his intent to create greater social justice. It was that I believed their statements, (which is in one of my published books), that they wanted traditional socialism with a dictatorship of the proletariat, then later, perhaps, a single party.
Those were the reasons for my opposition. In the case of Pinochet… [it was] because he began with brutality. The human rights violations were ferocious. Within seventy days he had intervened in the universities, appointing military personnel as their rectors.

[Augusto Pinochet (1915-2006) was dictator of Chile between 1973 and 1990.]

He dissolved the unions and the political parties and shut down the press. So if someone had opposed Salvador Allende or the forces that supported him, because [Allende] could lead [Chile] to a dictatorship of the proletariat, the only proper thing was to oppose that dictatorship of the right which had a completely unacceptable degree of criminality and violence.