Back to all interviews
Freedom Collection

Interviews with Genaro Arriagada

Interviewed May 20, 2024

We understood that campaign should be three or four very important things. I have already spoken of one: a reasonable program, for the people to feel that the coming democracy was a real democracy, where everybody could find their place under the sun.

Second: people had to be registered to vote. We managed to register seven and a half million. It was a great effort because at first people would say: “Why would we register if this will be a fraudulent referendum?” We would answer: “We will make sure that this is not a fraudulent referendum. So, register!”

Different people began to register. I remember one: Salvador Allende’s widow. When she was allowed to return [to Chile], she arrived at the Santiago

Airport and the first thing she said was “I come to register.” That was a very important shock because her statement led many of Allende’s supporters who did not want to register to do so.

[Salvador Allende (1908-1973) was president of Chile between 1970 and 1973.]

At the end, during the last sixty days, the Communist Party called [on citizens] to register. That was a task.
The second task was how to create a non-intimidating campaign that did not create fear. We made great efforts to research that. We conducted focus groups for the first time ever in Chile. /

I remember we also brought in Peter Hart, a distinguished American pollster. We brought in some Spaniards. We conducted a lot of research. What did the research show? The people wanted a message of confidence, of joy.

They did not want something that took them back to the past. I will put it in an interesting way, because the surveys showed that the human rights theme was not of much importance. We asked ourselves why if the dictatorship has been so strong, why wasn’t the theme of human rights more important.

The focus groups showed that it was not that it wasn’t important, but rather that the idea of reliving the torture, assassination, created an adverse reaction as if to say: “we are going to return to more of the same.”

So, what did we do? We said: we are going to pose the human rights problem in terms of it being a message about the future and not a message of revenge.