×

Fill out the brief form below for access to the free report.

  • George W. Bush Institute

    Our Ideas

  • Through our three Impact Centers — Domestic Excellence, Global Leadership, and our Engagement Agenda — we focus on developing leaders, advancing policy, and taking action to solve today’s most pressing challenges.

I'm interested in dates between:
--

Taking Action

Advancing Policy

Developing Leaders

Issues

I have minutes to read today:

Programs & Issues

Taking Action

Advancing Policy

Developing Leaders

Issues

Publication Type
Date
I'm interested in dates between:
--
Reading Time

I have minutes to read today:

Hidden Costs: The Precautionary Principle and Risks of Clean Energy Policy

July 15, 2013
By Dino Falaschetti
Centrally directing resources to clean energy may thus be shrinking economic opportunities while returning relatively little in the way of environmental benefits.

To the extent that “climate is a profoundly grander thing than energy,” reducing our rate of carbon emissions may have little effect on climate variation, and even the most productive politics would be incapable of improving environmental quality on this dimension. In this case, the politics of clean energy may primarily be directing resources to lower-valued uses, which not only weakens economic performance but also reduces environmental quality by increasing resource demands for any level of production. Rather than being a dominant strategy in the sense of reducing the possibility of harm with little if any downside, precautionary energy policies appear capable of inflicting considerable costs on both our economy and environment.