Fill out the brief form below for access to the free report.
Five Ways to Keep Accountability Simple
One theme that educators and policymakers kept returning to in interviews this year for The A Word is that school accountability systems have grown too complex, even unfathomable. A prime example is California's dashboard, which is muddled, messy, and virtually impenetrable to most parents.
The participants in our interviews, which included U.S. education secretaries, state education chiefs, school superintendents, and charter school founders and leaders, recognized that some complexity is necessary to keep an accountability system fair. A school, for example, shouldn't be evaluated solely upon the raw score of their students on a state achievement test. Other factors, such as the progress their students make in math, reading, and other pivotal subjects, should count as well.
Still, the scales needs to be weighted in a way that parents, students, and a community's citizens actually can understand the results. Drawing from the interviews, here are five ways to keep accountability simple:
*Get rid of education-speak, ditching phrases like “proficient in quantitative reasoning” or “learning at Level II.” Parents need to know in plain language whether their student is learning to read, write, and do math, as well as acquiring other relevant knowledge.
A few years ago, one of our interviewees, former Texas deputy education commissioner Lizzette Reynolds, even had to ask a colleague at her agency to explain the outcome of her own daughter’s exams on Texas’ achievement test. You know a system is off-kilter when even education officials have a hard time fathoming the results!
Simplifying accountability systems is not easy, but they lose their value if the public does not understand them. Parents especially begin to wonder why their schools even need an accountability system.
*Present data in a family-friendly way. Unlike what Reynolds experienced, Texas’ new report card helps parents understand where their children need attention or are excelling. They have a far better chance of understanding how well they read, write, and do math, as well as knowing what other must-have skills they are acquiring.
*Explain to parents how accountability benefits their children. The unfortunate perception exists that states and districts are just testing students for testing's sake. State leaders need to better explain that results from independent state exams can lead to classroom improvements for both low-achieving and high-achieving students. As Hanna Skandera, New Mexico’s former education secretary, put it, “Accountability is about asking, how well are we serving our kids?”
*Explain the relevance of state achievement tests. Parents see their kids taking a lot of tests, and teachers complaining about teaching to the test, but they don’t hear how those tests assess their student’s grasp of a subject, or how they are aligned to prepare their students for college or a good career. As former U.S. Education Secretary John King said, “Accountability systems are highly reliant on state tests. [People} have to know that the state tests are good and reflect the kinds of skills that students will need for success in college and careers.” Among their other duties, state education commissioners need to see themselves as the explainers-in-chief.
*Be transparent about what the data tells a community. Don't hide the harsh realities that will lead to unpleasant conversations, a point that former Kentucky chief academic officer Felicia Cumings Smith made. At the same time, celebrate the victories, as Texas Superintendent Daniel King said.
The goal of accountability is to drive student improvement, but that becomes hard to do when only education insiders understand the system and its results.
Anne Wicks serves as the Director of Education Reform at the Bush Institute. In this role, she develops and oversees the policy, research, and engagement work of the Education Reform team.
Before joining the Bush Institute, Wicks served for five years as Associate Dean for External Relations at the University of Southern California's Rossier School of Education. In addition to leading a team with revenue, communications, and engagement goals, she supported Dean Karen Symms Gallagher on a variety of special projects including the launch and early growth of Ednovate Charter Schools. She currently serves as the chair of PMC Support, a supporting organization for Ednovate Schools. Over her career, she has held management and resource development roles at organizations including Teach for America, the Lucile Packard Foundation for Children's Health, and Stanford University. Anne holds a B.A in American Studies and a M.A. in Education from Stanford University (during which she taught 8th grade social studies), as well as a M.B.A. from the University of Southern California. A former captain of Stanford's women's volleyball team, Anne was part of three national championship teams, two as a player and one as an assistant coach.Full Bio
Preparing All Kids for an Unpredictable Future
This essay, which draws from remarks that Bush Institute Education Reform Director Anne Wicks gave at the Bush Center's Forum on Leadership, appeared last week on The 74.
Forget the Edu-Wonks. NAEP Scores Should Get the Attention of Workforce Development Leaders
There is no shortage of buzz in the education policy world about the scores from the 2017 NAEP exam. But the people who really ought to be thinking about the results from the so-called “Nation’s Report Card” are the ones in charge of developing the workforce in a state or community.
Accountability Systems Need to be Simple Enough for Parents and the Public to Understand and Act Upon
What we need is a constant balancing of fairness and simplicity. This should be a primary goal for states like Texas now that the new Every Student Succeeds Act gives them more responsibility for holding schools accountable for their results.