Back to all interviews
Freedom Collection

Interviews with Birtukan Midekssa

Interviewed October 3, 2012

After the whole process went in the wrong direction – in our side, the opposition, especially my party – we tried to kind of resolve things through negotiation and discussion. But you know, we are not successful basically because of the unwillingness of the governing party. And so they wanted to resolve the challenge and the problem we had through violence. And you know, it was sad. And it was frustrating because the experience we had during the campaign and during the election day – you know, it was such a huge kind of achievement in terms of public opinion.

In a way, the public impressed that we can have political change without violence, you know, just through political debate and through ballot box. And it was such a stride in terms of political culture and in terms of public opinion. But you know, in a way, the way that our government wanted to handle the issues through violent means – you know, it was in a way, which leads the people or community to regression rather than, you know, toward some kind of development in terms of political culture as well. So after some months basically the security forces instigated some kind of violent clashes with our supporters and protesters.

And then of course the regime wanted to hold us accountable for that loss of life and property destruction. And we were charged with all types of crimes, starting from treason and an attempt to overthrow government through unconstitutional means and even genocide and all those things were incorporated in the charge. So not only us, the political party leaders, but you know, our supporters and our party members in tens of thousands were imprisoned all over the country. And especially those people who are not that known in the community and probably in the international circle as well – they were subjected to, you know, torture and maltreatment in a very bad prison condition. It was sad. But you know, after 21 months you know, we were pardoned, in a way.

Of course we were sentenced into life imprisonment by the court. The funny thing about the court process was, you know, all evidence brought before the court was the statements, you know, we gave as a press statement. And the things we said, you know, in the debate and in the campaign – you know, all these things were assumed and taken as a very normal and legal activities, which is in the realm of our right as citizens and as a political group. But you know, after our arrest and after our imprisonment that was the things, which were brought to attest that we are criminals. And it was a laughable process. And in a way it undermines the institution, the judiciary itself.

You know, or people would not assume that, you know, the judiciary we’re having is an institution which finds out the real truth and which implements the laws of the country and which renders real justice. So it was a very frustrating process. But the bad thing, more than our plight and the political prisoners, the whole political space was changed entirely. And the space for the political opposition, the space for civil society and the space for the private press was dramatically narrowed down. And in fact, this time around the government became very blunt about it. And you know, before 2005 – even in 2005, you know, the regime kind of portray itself as a cherisher of, you know, the ideas of liberty and rule of law and everything.

But this time around, you know, the regime, you know, is conveying a message saying that liberal democracy is not for Ethiopia. You know, we are against neoliberals and you know, all those things. Actually the prime minister of the country’s becoming very prominent in articulating some bankruptcy in liberal democracy or neoliberals and all those things. So the – you know, they promulgated series of laws which curtails the space for the opposition, for the press, for the civil society, as I already said. And there is a very interesting promulgation, which is a new development in our legal process, which is a law against terror.

And basically what this law is serving as like, you know, they try – they used it to criminalize dissent, dissent in any form you know, dissent formulated by a journalist or a political person or even a citizen. Actually as the result of this, hundreds of people are still behind bars. And so 2005 and the things happened in the aftermath – you know, it affected the political process and the political space in a very bad way.