Mark Dynarski is founder and president of Pemberton Research, which focuses on understanding and utilizing research evidence in decision making. Previously, he was vice president and director of the Center for Improving Research Evidence at Mathematica Policy Research. He also previously served as director of the What Works Clearinghouse at the Institute of Education Sciences at the U.S. Department of Education, and as director and principal investigator of numerous education programs with a focus on at-risk children and youth. Currently he is a senior fellow (nonresident) at the Brown Center for Education Policy at the Brookings Institute.
Dynarski is an advisor to government agencies, philanthropies, and nonprofit organizations. He is well known for his expertise in econometrics and evaluation methodology, including the design, implementation, and analysis of evaluations of education programs using random assignment and quasi-experimental designs
Dynarski has published widely in peer-reviewed journals, including Educational Researcher, Educational Leadership, and Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk. He is also on the editorial boards of Effective Education and The Elementary School Journal.
Dynarski earned an M.A. and Ph.D. in economics from the Johns Hopkins University and holds a B.A. in economics from the State University of New York at Geneseo. He also was a tenured professor of economics at the University of California, Davis, where he taught theory, statistics, and econometrics.
Related Articles and Resources
Going backward in the debate about accountability and American education
Randi Weingarten and Linda Darling-Hammond recently asserted in a Huffington Post blog entry that the emerging challenges to implementing the...
The Myth of the High Achiever: Accountability is for All Schools
A gaffe, it once was said, is when a politician tells the truth. This came to mind when I read what Secretary of Education Arne Duncan said...
Productivity for Results Series
In early 2014, the Bush Institute released a series of papers that examined the efficiency of schools.
When Done Right, Standardized Tests Reveal a Student's Knowledge
Parents may be curious, even skeptical, about the validity of the standardized exam their child took. But Bush Institute Education Reform Fellow Mark Dynarski explains how a rigorous process goes into creating those exams, and why they reveal a student's knowledge.
The Promise of Using Evidence to Improve Education
Data and evidence in education have come a long way since the Nineties. Today is the time to ensure that 15 years from now, we don’t wonder what happened with all that talk about using evidence to improve education.
“Research Says…” - Why quality research matters for education
As debates heat up over Common Core standards, the renewal of the No Child Left Behind Act and state testing policies, we often hear people citing...
Are Tests Bad?
None of us looked forward to taking our driver’s test. Yet none of us thinks doing away with the test is such a good idea. Passing the test...
Actually, State Tests Don't Take That Much Time Away from the Classroom
The arguments we hear against annual standardized exams typically revolve around students being tested too much and testing harming education. But...
Corporate education reform? No, just measurements.
The term “corporate education reform” appears regularly these days, including in this recent New York Times op-ed by David...