×

Fill out the brief form below for access to the free report.

  • George W. Bush Institute

    Content & Resources

  • Through our three Impact Centers -- Domestic Excellence, Global Leadership, and our Engagement Agenda -- we focus on developing leaders, advancing policy, and taking action to solve today’s most pressing challenges.

I'm interested in dates between:
--

Issues

I have minutes to read today:

Programs & Issues

Issues

Publication Type
Date Range
I'm interested in dates between:
--
Reading Time

I have minutes to read today:

International Election Observers and Why They Can Make a Difference

February 28, 2012 3 minute Read by Lindsay Lloyd

A February 21 blog post by Patrick Barta on The Wall Street Journal’s Southeast Asia Real Time blog  notes that just six weeks before important elections in Burma, the government still has not announced whether it will permit international monitors to observe the vote.  The April 1 elections will fill 48 vacant parliamentary seats and if conducted fairly, could offer opposition groups like Aung San Suu Kyi’s National League for Democracy an opportunity to participate in governance.  For the Burmese government, the elections are a key benchmark in ending years of economic and political sanctions and relative isolation. International election observation is not a panacea, but it can be a key confidence-building measure.  Independent observers can help to instill trust in the election system, especially in environments like that in Burma, where one-party rule often means the opposition has no meaningful role in government, election administration, or the media.  International monitoring can also encourage deeply divided societies, such as those in post-conflict environments, to accept the outcome of the vote. Many groups and organizations conduct election observation missions.  Multinational groupings such as the European Union (EU), African Union (AU), and Organization of American States (OAS) are among the most visible.  Nongovernmental organizations such as the Carter Center, National Democratic Institute (NDI), and the International Republican Institute (IRI) are also active. International election monitoring works best when it is part of a broader effort to support democratic institutions.  Active political parties and domestic civil society groups are vital in engaging citizens and fighting electoral fraud.  A free press that offers access to all parties and can report without censorship helps protect the integrity of the process.  And governments can promote confidence in the electoral system and its outcome by allowing opposition and neutral representatives a meaningful role in election administration.  International election observers can help by offering an impartial, outside perspective on the process and recommendations on ways to improve the system. Burma’s government has pledged the April elections will be fair and transparent.  But with only weeks remaining before the vote, time is growing short.  A speedy decision to welcome international election observers would be a positive signal to both Burmese voters and the world that the government is serious about putting the country on the road to democracy and reform. This post was written by Lindsay Lloyd, Program Director of the Freedom Collection at the George W. Bush Institute.


Author

Lindsay Lloyd
Lindsay Lloyd

Lindsay Lloyd is the Deputy Director of the Human Freedom Initiative at the George W. Bush Institute, where he manages original research and programmatic efforts to advance freedom and democracy in the world. Lindsay currently leads the Bush Institute’s Freedom in North Korea project, which raises awareness of human rights violations in North Korea, proposes new policy solutions, and engages leaders to help improve the lives of the North Korean people.  Lindsay is also responsible for managing the Freedom Collection, a multimedia archive that documents the stories of nonviolent freedom advocates from around the word. 

Prior to joining the Bush Institute, Lindsay served for 16 years at the International Republican Institute (IRI), most recently as senior advisor for policy.   Previously, he was IRI’s regional director for Europe and co-director of the regional program for Central and Eastern Europe, which was based in Slovakia.  At IRI, Lindsay worked with candidates, elected officials, political parties, and civil society activists to develop lasting democratic institutions.

Before joining IRI, Lindsay worked for several members and the leadership of the U.S. House of Representatives, as political director for a political action committee, and for Jack Kemp’s 1988 presidential campaign. He graduated from Georgetown University’s School of Foreign Service. 

Full Bio

Up Next:

Education and Economic Growth Four Percent on February 26, 2012