Fill out the brief form below for access to the free report.
With more back-and-forth in Washington over whether jobs will be created or the environment negatively impacted, the U.S. debate over the Keystone XL pipeline is now in its seventh year.
Submitted on September 19, 2008, the TransCanada Corporation pipeline application was presumed to be the equivalent of “watching paint dry, the absolute definition of boredom." With some 70 pipelines already in existence, the Keystone XL would be just another one, a practical and logical extension of the developing energy revolution underway within North America. The 2,600-plus mile pipeline linking the oil production of western Canada with U.S. refineries along the Gulf Coast was considered a win-win for both countries, economically and strategically.
Instead of being routine, U.S. consideration of the Keystone XL has undermined the confidence between Washington and Ottawa and clouded next steps in the continental relationship.
Having created extra bureaucratic review processes, the U.S. State Department released its “final supplemental environmental impact statement” in January 2014. That assessment replaced the “draft supplemental environmental impact statement” of March 2013.
In that January 2014 statement, the State Department concluded that Keystone would not significantly worsen global warming. This should have cleared the way for a presidential decision. However, the application remains “under review” at the State Department, per White House instruction.
There is a reasonable concern in both countries that the delays on Keystone have undercut the foundation that had been laid with the U.S.-Canada Free Trade Agreement and reinforced by the North American Free Trade Agreement. Over the past 20 years, Canada has redefined its economic well-being from an attitude of closing the 49th parallel (the border between the two countries) to bilateral economic integration that totals more than $730 billion in the two-way trade of goods and services. Overall, the trade and investment relationship amounts to $1.4 trillion. This economic nexus is especially notable in the area of energy: Canada is the number one supplier of energy to the United States.
The relationship between the United States and Canada runs deeper than a pipeline, however. The two nations share a geographic, cultural, political and economic heritage. As President John Kennedy said in an address before the Canadian Parliament in 1961, "[g]eography has made us neighbors. History has made us friends. Economics has made us partners. And necessity has made us allies” President Reagan reaffirmed the unique relationship in a 1985 speech in Quebec City: "We're more than friends and neighbors and allies; we are kin, who together have built the most productive relationship between any two countries in the world today."
So, while the keystone of the U.S.-Canadian relationship is a shared set of values and interests, not a pipeline, the irony of the Keystone XL approval process is that it comes at a time when North American energy self-sufficiency is a reality. Unfortunately, U.S. procrastination on the Keystone XL has caused Canada to more vigorously look to Asia for energy export markets. Such a reorientation could be at the expense of this continent’s prosperity and long-term competitive edge.
This is exactly the moment to enhance an integrated energy market, consolidating the continent’s position in the global marketplace. The Keystone XL pipeline is an integral step in achieving that objective.
Daniel Fisk is a Fellow with the Bush Institute's Economic Growth initiative.
Daniel W. Fisk, a Bush Institute Fellow, is the Chief Operations Officer of the International Republican institute (IRI), a non-partisan, non-profit organization dedicated to promoting democratic principles, independent civil society, and respect for human rights. Fisk formerly served in various positions in the U.S. Government, including as Special Assistant to the President and Senior Director for Western Hemisphere Affairs on the National Security Council during the George W. Bush Administration. He also has served in the State and Defense Departments, and on the staffs of the Senate Foreign Relations and House Foreign Affairs Committees.
Fisk holds a juris doctor and a master’s degree in government from Georgetown University and a bachelor’s degree from the University of Tulsa.Full Bio
Domestic Excellence: A Look Back at 2018
As we look back on 2018, we celebrate some of the top moments from the Bush Institute’s work in domestic excellence.
Policy Recommendations: Bolstering America's Economy through Trade
Strengthening North America strengthens the United States
Two-Minute Take: NAFTA vs. USMCA
The United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement makes substantial changes to modernize trade rules in effect from 1994. What are these modifications and what do they mean for Americans?
El Paso del Norte, A Cross-Border Community
Reporting on their recent trip to El Paso, Matthew Rooney, managing director of the Bush Institute-SMU Economic Growth Initiative, and William McKenzie, editorial director of the Bush Institute, explain why El Paso del Norte points to both the challenges and potential benefits of the close relationship between the United States and Mexico.