Fill out the brief form below for access to the free report.
This post also appeared on www.freedomcollection.org
In 2005, when former United Nations Secretary General Kofi Annan announced the replacement of the Human Rights Commission, he said that the “politicization of its sessions and the selectivity of its work” had “cast a shadow on the reputation of the United Nations system as a whole.” It didn’t help that human rights abusers like Iran and Syria had been members. A new Human Rights Council was supposed to “offer a fresh start.” Yet the latest iteration of the UN body has fallen into the same trap. Currently the Human Rights Council boasts the membership of Cuba, Russia, China, and Saudi Arabia. Last week the organization held its annual election and selected new members such as Ethiopia, Kazakhstan, Pakistan and Venezuela. According to Thor Halvorssen, President of the New York based Human Rights Foundation, “The UN Human Rights Council has become perhaps the most effective tool for dictators to divert attention away from their own abuses. With some of the world’s most egregious rights violators newly elected, we need to ask, how much credibility does the Council have left?” Venezuela is one of the worst offenders in the Western Hemisphere. Freedom House rates Venezuela as only partly free. According to Human Rights Watch, Venezuela is using criminal prosecution to go after critics of the government. Freedom of speech is in decline, and the judiciary has effectively been coopted. A club where delegations from Venezuela and Cuba lecture the world on human rights can’t be taken seriously and violates the terms of regional charters like the American Declaration on the Rights and Duties of Man as well as the Human Rights Council’s own founding, which called for members to “uphold the highest standards in the promotion and protection of human rights.” Unfortunately, the United States’ own re-election to the council this year is unlikely to change things. Organizations like the UN Human Rights Council are meant to represent oppressed peoples, not to be a propaganda office for the world’s despots. It must start taking human rights seriously if it is to gain respect and become a credible interlocutor for those who too often are voiceless in the face of tyranny.
This post was written by Joel D. Hirst, a Human Freedom Fellow at the George W. Bush Institute. Find him on Twitter: @joelhirst
Before joining the George W. Bush Institute, Joel Hirst was a recipient of the prestigious International Affairs Fellowship at the Council on Foreign Relations, where he researched the Cuba/Venezuela-sponsored Bolivarian Alliance of the Americas. He worked for six years with USAID’s Office of Transition Initiatives in Uganda, focusing on post-conflict transition in Lord’s Resistance Army–affected areas. In Venezuela, he worked for four years on democracy promotion, elections, civil society, and human rights. Prior to this, Hirst worked as a humanitarian relief worker with World Vision in countries such as Pakistan, Venezuela, Kosovo, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Chad, Honduras, and Nicaragua. He writes and appears frequently in the media.
To find out more about Joel, you can also visit his personal website.Full Bio
Chinese Prisoner’s Death Holds a Message for Americans and China
Liu Xiaobo, China’s most prominent dissident and Nobel Peace Prize winner died this week. His death holds a message for Americans and for China.
Release of Chinese Political Prisoner a Timely Reminder to Support Freedom Advocates Abroad
More than half the world’s population still lives in countries where basic political rights and civil liberties are only partly respected, if at all.
Bringing Freedom to the Forefront of 21st Century Politics
Is the global liberal democratic order in danger? Purposefully constructed in the aftermath of World War II, this order -- and the American leadership that is central to its success --has contributed to securing peace and expanding prosperity in the United States and around the world. Today, that order appears to be dissolving. This crisis is not new or sudden; it has been mounting for several years. Global challenges like authoritarian capitalism, violent extremism, demographic pressures, and displaced populations have placed global freedom in decline. Fraying traditional alliances united by core values of freedom are increasingly weak to respond. It is alarming that the downdraft in democratic resilience over the past decade or more includes countries that have long been part of the consolidated democratic West. This is democratic deconsolidation. In much of the Western world, we see a rise in demagogic populism, illiberalism, nationalism, protectionism, and waning conf
The Importance of Speaking Truth to Tyrants
What the president of the United States says matters. Even during the realpolitik policies of détente under Richard Nixon, it was still clear that American policy was based on a set of core values. Nixon’s practical goals of reaching deals with America’s adversaries was never based on the “great chemistry” with himself or praising the Soviet or Communist Chinese leadership doing a “fantastic job.” When the president aligns himself with the autocrats and dictators, he aligns America with their oppression. He sends a message that corruption and brutality are not our concern. Contrast that with how Ronald Reagan defied much of world opinion in calling out the brutality of the Soviet system. Natan Sharansky, then a refusenik imprisoned in a Soviet gulag, later wrote for the Weekly Standard of his thoughts on Reagan’s pronouncement that the USSR was an evil empire: “It was the great, brilliant moment whe