Fill out the brief form below for access to the free report.
This post originally appeared on www.FreedomCollection.org.
Pope Benedict XVI stunned the Catholic world after announcing he would resign at the end of this month. In fairness, Pope Benedict XVI faced a thankless task after his election in 2005. His papacy existed within the long shadow of his predecessor: the beloved Pope John Paul II. Everything about the former Karol Józef Wojtyła inspired us. He grew up in Poland surviving under both Nazi occupation and Soviet dictatorship. Beyond his role as a faith leader, Pope John Paul II was a charismatic freedom activist, a scholar, a political force, a gifted mediator, and a talented soccer player who inspired Catholics and non-Catholics alike. He traveled throughout the world offering his support for democratic movements from South Africa to Chile. Even in his final years, in which he was debilitated by Parkinson’s disease, Pope John Paul II demonstrated his resolve to overcome adversity. As Pope, he was an enduring symbol of freedom and hope in an era where the threat of nuclear annihilation and international terrorism dominated most public discourse.
With news of Pope Benedict XVI’s impending resignation, the intrigue now shifts to speculation of who will lead the Church in a turbulent 21st century world. In 1978, Pope John Paul II was an unexpected choice to assume the Vatican’s top spot, but he proved to be an ideal candidate for the time. As the first Polish Pope (and the first non-Italian since 1523), he was able to use his position as a global religious leader to influence democratic change in Soviet-dominated Central and Eastern Europe. No doubt his roots in that region played a part in his ability to inspire people and events there. The next Papal conclave might consider electing a successor that fits the mold of Pope John Paul II. By this, I mean a future Pope from the developing world who can champion peace and prosperity under conditions of greater individual freedom.
Catholicism is expanding in the developing world; the New York Times notes that 57 percent of Catholics now live in Latin America and Africa. Remembering the example of Pope John Paul II, imagine the impact a Latin American Pope might have on freedom in that region - in Cuba for example. As the Church’s evangelization efforts continue in Africa, imagine the spotlight an African Pope might place on repressive countries like Ethiopia and Equatorial Guinea. Consider the gravity of an Asian Pope pressing China and North Korea on religious freedom and tolerance. Some interesting candidates highlighted by Foreign Policy include: Ghana’s Cardinal Peter Turkson, Argentina’s Cardinal Leonard Sandri, Nigeria’s Cardinal Francis Arinze, Brazil’s Cardinal Odilo Scherer, and the Philippines’ Cardinal Luis Tagle.
A Pope who advocates for freedom is not a silver bullet against tyranny, but as John Paul II demonstrated, the position can dramatically affect people and political forces. When next we see white smoke rising above Saint Peter’s Cathedral, it will be interesting to learn if we have a Pope who fits the mold of John Paul II.
This post was written by Christopher Walsh, Program Coordinator for the Freedom Collection.
Christopher Walsh serves as Senior Program Manager for the Human Freedom and Women's Initiative at the George W. Bush Institute. In this role, Christopher manages communications, evaluation, and public policy research projects that advance freedom and democracy in the world. He also develops and implements efforts to make the Bush Institute a welcoming place for today’s generation of dissidents and democracy advocates, overseeing visits for training, inspiration, and insight.
Prior to joining the Bush Institute, Christopher worked with the International Republican Institute in Washington, D.C. As IRI’s program officer for Central and Eastern Europe, he coordinated political party building and civic advocacy programs in the Balkans and Turkey.
A native of Cape Cod, Massachusetts, Christopher is a graduate of American University with a B.A. in International Studies. He currently lives in Dallas with his wife and three young children.Full Bio
Chinese Prisoner’s Death Holds a Message for Americans and China
Liu Xiaobo, China’s most prominent dissident and Nobel Peace Prize winner died this week. His death holds a message for Americans and for China.
Release of Chinese Political Prisoner a Timely Reminder to Support Freedom Advocates Abroad
More than half the world’s population still lives in countries where basic political rights and civil liberties are only partly respected, if at all.
Bringing Freedom to the Forefront of 21st Century Politics
Is the global liberal democratic order in danger? Purposefully constructed in the aftermath of World War II, this order -- and the American leadership that is central to its success --has contributed to securing peace and expanding prosperity in the United States and around the world. Today, that order appears to be dissolving. This crisis is not new or sudden; it has been mounting for several years. Global challenges like authoritarian capitalism, violent extremism, demographic pressures, and displaced populations have placed global freedom in decline. Fraying traditional alliances united by core values of freedom are increasingly weak to respond. It is alarming that the downdraft in democratic resilience over the past decade or more includes countries that have long been part of the consolidated democratic West. This is democratic deconsolidation. In much of the Western world, we see a rise in demagogic populism, illiberalism, nationalism, protectionism, and waning conf
The Importance of Speaking Truth to Tyrants
What the president of the United States says matters. Even during the realpolitik policies of détente under Richard Nixon, it was still clear that American policy was based on a set of core values. Nixon’s practical goals of reaching deals with America’s adversaries was never based on the “great chemistry” with himself or praising the Soviet or Communist Chinese leadership doing a “fantastic job.” When the president aligns himself with the autocrats and dictators, he aligns America with their oppression. He sends a message that corruption and brutality are not our concern. Contrast that with how Ronald Reagan defied much of world opinion in calling out the brutality of the Soviet system. Natan Sharansky, then a refusenik imprisoned in a Soviet gulag, later wrote for the Weekly Standard of his thoughts on Reagan’s pronouncement that the USSR was an evil empire: “It was the great, brilliant moment whe