Fill out the brief form below for access to the free report.
The news last week that King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia has followed through on his commitment to appoint women to the consultative Shura Council marks not only an historic change for the Kingdom but also an important advance for women’s rights in the Arab world.
In particular, the powerful symbolism of the Shura now having 30 women members should help move other institutions to begin allowing women members. However, the greatest point of optimism is that the King followed through at all. The last two years of Arab Spring stresses on Saudi Arabia and public demands for reform have caused some to believe that women would have to wait longer to join the Shura Council. And since the King has now followed through on this promise, it is even more likely that he will follow through on his pledge to allow women to vote and stand for office when municipal elections are next called.
The King deserves credit for doing what is in the best interest of the Saudi Arabia and all of its citizens. Giving women a voice in the consultative Shura will be another means of showing that the citizens of Saudi Arabia aren’t fundamentally different from those in Kuwait, Jordan, Yemen or other countries of the Arab world: they need representatives from every segment of society. The change may not be simple, but like every country that has gone through the same process, the people will benefit in the end. And that is the point.
The Kingdom has no shortage of energetic and smart women who are ready to serve the public. The King’s decision is an acknowledgement that effective leaders are needed, regardless of gender. This week’s announcement may be a relatively small step for Saudi women, but it is a big stride for the Saudi Arabia. The giant leap will come later.
Kent Patton is the Freedom Collection Blog Editor.
Chinese Prisoner’s Death Holds a Message for Americans and China
Liu Xiaobo, China’s most prominent dissident and Nobel Peace Prize winner died this week. His death holds a message for Americans and for China.
Release of Chinese Political Prisoner a Timely Reminder to Support Freedom Advocates Abroad
More than half the world’s population still lives in countries where basic political rights and civil liberties are only partly respected, if at all.
Bringing Freedom to the Forefront of 21st Century Politics
Is the global liberal democratic order in danger? Purposefully constructed in the aftermath of World War II, this order -- and the American leadership that is central to its success --has contributed to securing peace and expanding prosperity in the United States and around the world. Today, that order appears to be dissolving. This crisis is not new or sudden; it has been mounting for several years. Global challenges like authoritarian capitalism, violent extremism, demographic pressures, and displaced populations have placed global freedom in decline. Fraying traditional alliances united by core values of freedom are increasingly weak to respond. It is alarming that the downdraft in democratic resilience over the past decade or more includes countries that have long been part of the consolidated democratic West. This is democratic deconsolidation. In much of the Western world, we see a rise in demagogic populism, illiberalism, nationalism, protectionism, and waning conf
The Importance of Speaking Truth to Tyrants
What the president of the United States says matters. Even during the realpolitik policies of détente under Richard Nixon, it was still clear that American policy was based on a set of core values. Nixon’s practical goals of reaching deals with America’s adversaries was never based on the “great chemistry” with himself or praising the Soviet or Communist Chinese leadership doing a “fantastic job.” When the president aligns himself with the autocrats and dictators, he aligns America with their oppression. He sends a message that corruption and brutality are not our concern. Contrast that with how Ronald Reagan defied much of world opinion in calling out the brutality of the Soviet system. Natan Sharansky, then a refusenik imprisoned in a Soviet gulag, later wrote for the Weekly Standard of his thoughts on Reagan’s pronouncement that the USSR was an evil empire: “It was the great, brilliant moment whe