×

Fill out the brief form below for access to the free report.

  • George W. Bush Institute

    Our Ideas

  • Through our three Impact Centers — Domestic Excellence, Global Leadership, and our Engagement Agenda — we focus on developing leaders, advancing policy, and taking action to solve today’s most pressing challenges.

I'm interested in dates between:
--

Taking Action

Advancing Policy

Developing Leaders

Issues

I have minutes to read today:

Programs & Issues

Taking Action

Advancing Policy

Developing Leaders

Issues

Publication Type
Date
I'm interested in dates between:
--
Reading Time

I have minutes to read today:

The U.S. Budget Deficit Remains a Huge Problem

May 3, 2012 3 minute Read by Robert E. Litan

It’s not just on Wall Street and in some Congressional offices that one hears alarmist talk about the trillion-dollar plus federal budget deficits. It clearly has been one of the main themes stressed in numerous panels — ostensibly on different topics — here at the Milken Institute’s annual global conference in Los Angeles. The consensus seems to be that Congress has a narrow window in 2013, after the election, to do something about the problem — going well beyond the August 2011 budget deal that is supposed to yield $1.5 trillion in budget savings over 10 years (or a 10-year $1.2 trillion sequestration beginning January 1 if the $1.5 trillion has not been legislated before the end of this calendar year). The logical place to begin is with the Simpson-Bowles plan, or something close to it. This will be issue number one on the domestic policy agenda regardless of the outcome of the Presidential election. At some point, the bond market vigilantes will mount an attack on U.S. Treasuries if no major long-run budget deal is arranged. U.S. policy makers will be playing Russian Roulette with the financial health of our economy, and that of the rest of the world, if they fail to act. One final word: If a budget deal is made, fiscal policy will be taken off the table as a tool of counter-cyclical monetary policy for a very long time. This means it will fall to the Fed to maintain low short-term interest rates to keep the expansion going, absent a pickup inflation, so that we can bring down our intolerably high unemployment rate. Indeed, a budget deal by itself also would help keep long-term interest rates at their record lows, which among other things would help heal the housing market. This is yet another reason it is in the national interest for our political leaders to finally address the long-term budget imbalance.


Author

Robert E. Litan

2012 Economic Growth Fellow

Robert E. Litan is Director of Research of B-Gov, a subsidiary of Bloomberg LLP. Previously Litan was Vice President for Research and Policy at the Kauffman Foundation and a Senior Fellow in Economic Studies at the Brookings Institution. He has authored or co-authored more than 20 books, edited another 14, and authored or co-authored more than 200 articles in journals, magazines, and newspapers. He has served in several capacities in the federal government. From 1995 to 1996, he was associate director of the Office of Management and Budget, and from 1993 to 1995 he was Deputy Assistant Attorney General. He received his B.S. in economics (summa cum laude) from the Wharton School of Finance at the University of Pennsylvania; his J.D. from Yale Law School; and both his M. Phil. and Ph.D. in economics from Yale University.

Full Bio

Related Articles: