×

Fill out the brief form below for access to the free report.

  • George W. Bush Institute

    Our Ideas

  • Through our three Impact Centers — Domestic Excellence, Global Leadership, and our Engagement Agenda — we focus on developing leaders, advancing policy, and taking action to solve today’s most pressing challenges.

I'm interested in dates between:
--

Issues

I have minutes to read today:

Programs & Issues

Issues

Publication Type
Date
I'm interested in dates between:
--
Reading Time

I have minutes to read today:

The Free Expression Problems Of Authoritarian Regimes

June 7, 2012 by Joel Hirst

This blog was originally posted on www.freedomcollection.org. Five years ago this week, Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez took RCTV off the air, Venezuela’s oldest and most important television channel, seizing its infrastructure, equipment and frequency.  I was there when this happened. From my perch I watched as the unarmed marchers protesting this attack on independent media and free expression – many of them women, children and the elderly – were beaten by police with batons, choked by tear gas, and arrested in droves. Chavez’s objection to the channel was not to its famous “novelas” (soap-operas), which are an important part of the life of Venezuelans, especially the poor.  The act was elicited by the president’s hatred for programs like journalist (now National Assembly Deputy) Miguel Angel Rodrigez’s “The Interview,” whose content was critical of the government.  In Venezuela, as in other authoritarian regimes, the only voice the government wants to hear is its own. In point of fact, in representative democracies there should be no monolithic voice of government.   Occasionally, when a spokesperson of an office or agency at the service of the people wishes to deliver a public interest announcement, they can, like any other citizen, use the mechanisms of the news media and a free internet.  Authoritarian regimes that do not see their role as representing their people but instead controlling them violate this principle, and then go further.  They believe not only that their monolithic governments should have their own voice but also that theirs should be the only voice.  Dissenting ideas, critical opinions, and the truth are dubbed treason and dealt with harshly. In Venezuela, the Chavez regime has co-opted or seized dozens of television and radio stations.  In Ecuador President Correa has unleashed an assault on the press which included multimillion dollar fines for one opinion piece he considered defamatory  (international pressure eventually led Correa to issue a pardon).  In China, powerful internet filters are used to limit the people’s access to certain information; and in Russia bloggers are jailed.  In Cuba, the installation of a highly touted $80 million fiber optic cable linking the island with Venezuela did not improve connectivity for the Cuban people, proving once again that the totalitarian regime is keeping its people in the dark intentionally. Freedom of information, speech and communication is one of democracy’s most prized possessions.  It is first in line in the U.S. Bill of Rights and is defended unwaveringly by the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.  It is only through the robust debate of ideas that citizens are engaged, governments are held to account, and solutions to common problems are found.  As Marcel Granier, President of RCTV, has said in a video interview for the Freedom Collection, “[we must] find ways to reestablish democracy and pluralism and respect for other people’s lives and opinions in Venezuela.”   This can only be done through a free, fearless, and introspective media that is respected by a democratic government. This post was written by Joel D. Hirst, a Human Freedom Fellow at the George W. Bush Institute.  Find him on Twitter: @joelhirst


Author

Joel Hirst
Joel Hirst

Before joining the George W. Bush Institute, Joel Hirst was a recipient of the prestigious International Affairs Fellowship at the Council on Foreign Relations, where he researched the Cuba/Venezuela-sponsored Bolivarian Alliance of the Americas. He worked for six years with USAID’s Office of Transition Initiatives in Uganda, focusing on post-conflict transition in Lord’s Resistance Army–affected areas. In Venezuela, he worked for four years on democracy promotion, elections, civil society, and human rights. Prior to this, Hirst worked as a humanitarian relief worker with World Vision in countries such as Pakistan, Venezuela, Kosovo, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Chad, Honduras, and Nicaragua. He writes and appears frequently in the media.


To find out more about Joel, you can also visit his personal website.

Full Bio

Up Next:

Recovery? What recovery? Four Percent on June 6, 2012