Fill out the brief form below for access to the free report.
Why the Movers and Shakers in Cities Should Use the New State of Our Cities Report
How many times have business, civic, or media leaders in a city seen data on the city's schools and wondered exactly what it means or how it compares to other cities? Is it a good thing that 78% of our students graduate high school? What about the fact that 85% of our city's kids pass reading at a basic level in 8th grade according to state tests – but only 33% of those same 8th graders are proficient in reading according to a national test. Which number is right? Are they measuring the same thing? How does our average teacher salary compare to other cities? How are leaders supposed to navigate these numbers, put them into context, and then make decisions?
The new State of Our Cities report, released today at a mayors’ roundtable at the Bush Center, is an explanatory and comparative tool prepared by the George W. Bush Institute to help leaders (and average citizens, for that matter) make sense of city level education data.
The report pulls together publically available information (more than 30 different data points) for 114 large US cities. The information ranges from the number of schools and students, median family income and child poverty rate, teacher salaries, and after-school programs. But, potentially the most insightful data is the student academic competency data. The tool includes state test data, the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) data – which includes TUDA data (a special NAEP for 22 specific large urban cities/districts), and data on graduation rates and measures of college readiness. This information can then be easily compared across cities and across demographic groups within a city to get a very broad picture of what is happening in a particular city’s schools.
One of the most helpful comparisons is that between state test results and the results on the NAEP. State tests vary greatly from state to state, but NAEP, a national test, helps show how students perform across the country. State of Our Cities reveals that some cities have very similar "passing at basic" scores on their state tests AND on their NAEP scores. The results corroborate each other, as we would hope they would.
But it is surprising (and discomforting) that some cities show, say, 87% of their students passing at basic 8th grade reading when the NAEP data shows only 55% of their students passing basic 8th grade reading. Reading scores at the 8th grade level are a decent predictor of a student’s performance in high school and beyond – so it is important that cities really understand proficiency of their respective students.
Let's take a mythical city as an example - Pleasantville, USA. You can use State of Our Cities and review Pleasantville’s city report to see data on academic outcomes, district trends, school finance, college and career pathways, school characteristics and environment. You can pull up cities that are similar to Pleasantville and discover that cities with similar average family incomes and racial makeup, in fact, do much better than Pleasantville on NAEP's TUDA evaluation. This tells you that other similar cities have managed to do a better job educating their students, comparing apples to apples. However, you do see that Pleasantville has a fairly high average teacher salary and a stronger early childhood program compared to other similar cities. You also notice that Pleasantville has a lower percentage of minority students taking Advanced Placement courses than other similar cities.
These kinds of comparisons reveal the questions we should be asking of ourselves and our city’s education leaders. What cities can we learn from? What successes should we celebrate and encourage? Where does my city need to focus significant resources (people, money, policies and time) to improve?
A small warning to the leaders who delve into this tool: it is fairly addictive. The ability to make the various comparisons is compelling, and it is easy to get lost doing things like comparing your current city to the one where you were raised, looking for the cities who seem to be doing a very good job in certain areas - certainly good news for the children who live there- versus other cities with similar demographics.
The challenge for all of us is to bring all of our cities up to the level of those that are doing the best. Hopefully, this tool will help city leaders do exactly that.
Beth Ann Bryan currently serves as a senior advisor for Education Reform at The George W. Bush Institute. Starting in 2010, Bryan has been working with the Bush Institute as a Policy Associate in the Middle School Matters program, helping ensure that every American high school graduate is college-ready and prepared for a good job.
Bryan also serves as senior education advisor to Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP, where she assists both private and public entities with the implementation of education reforms and counsels clients on education policy issues. Her recent experience includes helping to develop initiatives to improve secondary school literacy, navigating policy issues affecting students in pre-k through college for higher education officials and ensuring that instructional practice in education is driven by high quality research.
Prior to joining Akin Gump, Bryan served as a senior advisor to U.S. Secretary of Education Roderick Paige from 2001 to 2003. She also served as a member of the President’s Commission on Excellence in Special Education and worked closely with First Lady Laura Bush’s office on education initiatives in Texas and nationwide.
After leaving Washington in 2003, Bryan served as the volunteer Executive Director of the Laura Bush Foundation for America’s Libraries. Prior to joining the U.S. Department of Education, Bryan worked as an education advisor to the Texas Governor’s Business Council. Bryan previously worked as a Psychological Associate in private practice for 12 years and as a public school teacher in Houston, Texas for seven years.
Bryan received her Bachelor of Arts from Houston Baptist University in 1969 and her Master of Education from the University of Houston in 1978. She has served as Vice Chair of the National Board for Education Sciences.Full Bio
Keep Testing Alive -- But Right-Size Assessments
Lessons Learned from The A Word: Accountability-The Dirty Word of Today's Education Reform
No Child Left Behind’s Legacy – and What School Accountability Means Today
In an essay published this week on The 74, a national education news site, Holly Kuzmich, the Bush Institute’s executive director, provides an insider’s look at the creation of No Child Left Behind (NCLB). Kuzmich, who worked on the landmark legislation that President Bush signed into law 16 years ago this month, also describes the bipartisan bill’s legacy. Anne Wicks, the Bush Institute’s education reform director, and William McKenzie, the Bush Institute’s editorial director, describe as well on The 74 what school accountability means today – and how it can be improved. Their essay includes lessons learned from The A Word: Accountability—The Dirty Word of Today’s Education Reform, a new Bush Institute series of interviews with respected education leaders.
The Next Big Thing in School Accountability: Better Supports for Students and Teachers
Lessons Learned from The A Word: Accountability--The Dirty Word of Today's Education Reform