Fill out the brief form below for access to the free report.
Interview with Ukrainian Freedom Advocate, Sergiy Shtukarin
Freedom Matters to Ukraine’s Sergiy Shtukarin, a fellow with the John McCain Institute’s Next Generation Leaders’ program. Sergiy spent the year in Dallas with the Bush Institute’s Human Freedom and Economic Growth Initiatives. We talked with Sergiy about challenges for Ukrainian democracy, his work in the United States, and why freedom in Eastern Europe matters to Americans.
GWBI: What kind of work have you been doing in Ukraine?
Sergiy: I dedicated myself to advancing Ukraine’s European Union (EU) integration and taught European Studies to university students and civil servants. I also led a think-tank in Donetsk, conducting public opinion research and taking part in advocacy campaigns to strengthen the region’s civil society.
During the Euromaidan protests that ousted Viktor Yanukovych’s pro-Russian government, I co-founded the Civil Liberties Coalition in Donetsk.
From 2014-2015, as a member of the United Nations Human Rights field mission, I researched human rights violations, interviewed victims, documented cases, and contributed to UN public reports on the human rights situation in Ukraine.
GWBI: Why are you currently in the United States?
Sergiy: In 2015, the U.S. Embassy in Ukraine nominated me for the Next Generation Leaders’ program offered by the John McCain Institute for International Leadership. I was selected to the program and placed with the Bush Institute, dividing my time between the Human Freedom and Economic Growth initiatives and also working on my own leadership project, Incubator for Green Communities; it aims to mentor Ukraine’s local communities on sustainability and help them achieve the U.N. Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).
I also promote awareness about Ukraine in the United States via outreach to the Ukrainian diaspora; together we are building lasting partnerships to advance SDGs in Ukraine, but also strengthening transatlantic ties by connecting U.S. high school students who are passionate about human rights with their peers in Ukraine.
GWBI: Why should freedom in Ukraine and throughout the region matter to the United States?
Sergiy: Moscow is a common threat to peace and stability for Ukraine and the United States. They invaded and occupied Crimea and parts of the Donetsk and Luhansk regions of Ukraine. They may have instigated killings in Ukraine’s capital of Kyiv. Moscow also threatens U.S. and European interests around the world. Our struggle for freedom should not be viewed simply as a Russian-Ukrainian issue, but as part of a broader threat to the fundamental institutions of democracy and global security.
A glaring reason the conflict in Ukraine continues is the absence of freedom in Russia itself, where opposition is silenced, its leaders are imprisoned or killed, and many NGOs are labeled ‘foreign agents.’ Isolationism and indifference won’t solve the problem, but U.S. leadership could help advance freedom and stability in the region by exposing the rampant corruption, addressing illegal arms trade and trafficking, and prosecuting human rights violators.
My fellowship with the McCain and Bush Institutes reinforced my conviction that the world needs leaders capable of seeing beyond national borders and bringing people together around common principles to advance peace, freedom, and human dignity. Martin Luther King, Jr. was a great unifier, saying that “injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere.”
Christopher Walsh serves as a Manager for the Human Freedom Initiative at the George W. Bush Institute. In this role, Christopher manages communications, evaluation, and public policy research projects that advance freedom and democracy in the world. He also develops and implements efforts to make the Bush Institute a welcoming place for today’s generation of dissidents and democracy advocates, overseeing visits for training, inspiration, and insight.
Prior to joining the Bush Institute, Christopher worked with the International Republican Institute in Washington, D.C. As IRI’s program officer for Central and Eastern Europe, he coordinated political party building and civic advocacy programs in the Balkans and Turkey.
A native of Cape Cod, Massachusetts, Christopher is a graduate of American University with a B.A. in International Studies. He currently lives in Dallas with his wife and three young children.Full Bio
Chinese Prisoner’s Death Holds a Message for Americans and China
Liu Xiaobo, China’s most prominent dissident and Nobel Peace Prize winner died this week. His death holds a message for Americans and for China.
Release of Chinese Political Prisoner a Timely Reminder to Support Freedom Advocates Abroad
More than half the world’s population still lives in countries where basic political rights and civil liberties are only partly respected, if at all.
Bringing Freedom to the Forefront of 21st Century Politics
Is the global liberal democratic order in danger? Purposefully constructed in the aftermath of World War II, this order -- and the American leadership that is central to its success --has contributed to securing peace and expanding prosperity in the United States and around the world. Today, that order appears to be dissolving. This crisis is not new or sudden; it has been mounting for several years. Global challenges like authoritarian capitalism, violent extremism, demographic pressures, and displaced populations have placed global freedom in decline. Fraying traditional alliances united by core values of freedom are increasingly weak to respond. It is alarming that the downdraft in democratic resilience over the past decade or more includes countries that have long been part of the consolidated democratic West. This is democratic deconsolidation. In much of the Western world, we see a rise in demagogic populism, illiberalism, nationalism, protectionism, and waning conf
The Importance of Speaking Truth to Tyrants
What the president of the United States says matters. Even during the realpolitik policies of détente under Richard Nixon, it was still clear that American policy was based on a set of core values. Nixon’s practical goals of reaching deals with America’s adversaries was never based on the “great chemistry” with himself or praising the Soviet or Communist Chinese leadership doing a “fantastic job.” When the president aligns himself with the autocrats and dictators, he aligns America with their oppression. He sends a message that corruption and brutality are not our concern. Contrast that with how Ronald Reagan defied much of world opinion in calling out the brutality of the Soviet system. Natan Sharansky, then a refusenik imprisoned in a Soviet gulag, later wrote for the Weekly Standard of his thoughts on Reagan’s pronouncement that the USSR was an evil empire: “It was the great, brilliant moment whe