Fill out the brief form below for access to the free report.
Examining Ways to Make the North American Economy More Competititve
Recently, the George W. Bush Institute’s North American Competitiveness team met with officials from the North American Development Bank (NAD Bank). The meeting was part of the Institute’s study on how to improve North America’s border infrastructure and make our economy more competitive.
What is the NAD Bank?
The North American Development Bank and the Border Environment Cooperation Commission were formed in 1994 as a response to the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). Designated as an environmental infrastructure bank, its original task was to finance projects for wastewater treatment along the U.S.-Mexico border. Today, NAD Bank’s focus has widened to include air-quality improvement, wind energy, and solar energy projects.
How Does This Relate to Border Infrastructure?
There is currently no mechanism for regional infrastructure planning in North America. An entity similar to the NAD Bank is a potential solution for improving cross-border infrastructure on which so much of our economic competitiveness rests.
While NAD Bank has an environmental focus, it is an excellent model of how two countries can work together on transformative change. For example, many communities along the U.S.-Mexico border now experience improved health and safety as a result of basic water treatment infrastructure. While this does not directly impact trade, it is extremely important to the people who drive the trade relationship.
Why Border Infrastructure?
The Bush Institute believes that border infrastructure is critical to an economically competitive North America. Canada and Mexico are two of our largest trading partners, and much of that trade must pass through our land ports of entry. Around $2.4 billion - nearly 2 million tons of goods - move across North America daily. Trucks, rail, and pipelines carry more than 80% of the continent’s freight. For the U.S. to remain competitive in a global economy, trade must be able to move across our borders efficiently.
Laura Collins is the Deputy Director, Economic Growth at the George W. Bush Institute. Laura previously served as the Director of Immigration Policy at the American Action Forum. Laura has experience in politics, working as a Senior Research Analyst at the Republican National Committee for the 2012 election cycle and in the Texas House of Representatives for the 82nd Legislature. A former practicing attorney, Laura earned a JD from The University of Texas School of Law and a BBA from the University of Oklahoma.Full Bio
Don't Fall for Protectionism
“Protection will lead to great prosperity and strength.” In light of these words from President Trump’s inaugural address, his decision to levy tariffs on imports of steel and aluminum is not surprising. Those words also foreshadow his Administration’s withdrawal from the Trans-Pacific Partnership soon after he took office. And they provide a key to his Administration’s stated objectives in renegotiating NAFTA and the U.S.-Korea Free Trade Agreement. It may not have been clear to all of the many millions of people in attendance that day just how important those words were. With those words, the President announced a fundamental change to an American approach to trade that has guided our nation’s policy for almost a century – a century in which, not coincidentally, the United States became the wealthiest and most powerful nation on earth. In the NAFTA negotiations and, now, with the steel and aluminum ta
Trade Scores a Touchdown with Super Bowl Snacks
Whether you prefer pizza, wings, or chips and guacamole, the food on your table plays a large role in international trade.
Immigration Is Good For the Economy, Let’s Not Stifle It
The White House's framework for a legislative fix for Dreamers contains troubling provisions that raise many questions and concerns about our economy’s future.