Fill out the brief form below for access to the free report.
The most intriguing story of the last few days was the one about how it is as possible now for a child to move into the top 20 percent of income earners as it was three decades ago. The National Bureau of Economic Research released a report that shows Americans born in 1986 into the bottom 20 percent of household income had a nine percent chance of moving into the top fifth of income earners by their 20s or 30s. That rate is slightly better than a child born in 1971 into the bottom 20 percent of household income. They had an 8.4 percent chance of making it into the top 20 percent by their 20s or 30s.
To be sure, the report notes that the U.S. has low levels of economic mobility compared to other developed nations. Still, the fact that people can move up the economic ladder at the same rate of a few decades ago is welcome news. Very welcome news.
But the question is, what is the best way to help more people make that move?
That question has many answers, but developing the right skills is certainly a big one.
Another report I saw this week reveals that students who finish advanced math courses have much higher earnings a decade later. That is true even when researchers control for factors like family background. (This data comes from research done a decade ago for The Review of Economics and Statistics.)
So, something as basic as math skills can create economic mobility. And not just for white-collar workers. Welding programs at community colleges require serious math courses like algebra, geometry and calculus.
Oddly, the Texas Legislature took some steps back from the math front last year. For example, it de-emphasized Algebra II. (The State Board of Education held a hearing today to discuss renewing at least some of the Algebra II emphasis. I will report back later on its decision.)
The Legislature’s decision is risky because math skills help create more opportunities for Americans, which is what President Obama spoke about Tuesday night in his State of the Union address. In the policy world, this is about developing human capital, which sometimes gets overshadowed when critics argue that states are raising standards too high for kids.
Maybe the standards are increasing, but there is a payoff. Researchers Heather Rose and Julian Betts put it this way in their study of math skills a decade ago:
“Students who take more advanced math classes learn skills that may apply directly to certain jobs. They may also learn logic and reasoning skills that indirectly make them more productive. In addition, advanced math may also teach students how to learn. Finally, even if a job only requires basic math skills, a student who has taken advanced math has had an additional chance to master those skills.”
As we go forward on this blog, I am going to try to explain how elevating standards can pay off. If we believe all kids can learn, we should give them the chance to maximize their opportunities.
Image by K. Praslowicz
William McKenzie is editorial director for the George W. Bush Institute, where he also serves as editor of The Catalyst: A Journal of Ideas from the Bush Institute.
Active in education issues, he co-teaches an education policy class at SMU’s Simmons School of Education and Human Development. He also participates in the Bush Institute’s school accountability project.
Before joining the Bush Institute, the Fort Worth native served 22 years as an editorial columnist for the Dallas Morning News and led the newspaper’s Texas Faith blog. The University of Texas graduate’s columns appeared nationwide and he has won a Pulitzer Prize and commentary awards from the Education Writers Association, the American Academy of Religion, and the Texas Headliners Foundation, among other organizations. He still contributes columns and essays for the Morning News and The Weekly Standard.
Before joining the News in 1991, he earned a master’s degree in political science from the University of Texas at Arlington and spent a dozen years in Washington, D.C. During that time, he edited the Ripon Forum.
McKenzie has served as a Pulitzer Prize juror, on the board of a homeless organization, and on governing committees of a Dallas public school. He also is an elder of the First Presbyterian Church in Dallas, where he lives with his wife and their twin children.Full Bio
Regardless of their background, immigrants contribute to the United States
We must recognize that immigrants admitted due to a familial relationship or a diversity visa are also important contributors to our economy.
Deporting Salvadorans May Lead to Economic Decline
We should think carefully about a policy whose major impacts are likely to be reductions in employment and economic activity here at home, and increased instability and lawlessness along our borders.
Keep Testing Alive -- But Right-Size Assessments
Lessons Learned from The A Word: Accountability-The Dirty Word of Today's Education Reform
No Child Left Behind’s Legacy – and What School Accountability Means Today
In an essay published this week on The 74, a national education news site, Holly Kuzmich, the Bush Institute’s executive director, provides an insider’s look at the creation of No Child Left Behind (NCLB). Kuzmich, who worked on the landmark legislation that President Bush signed into law 16 years ago this month, also describes the bipartisan bill’s legacy. Anne Wicks, the Bush Institute’s education reform director, and William McKenzie, the Bush Institute’s editorial director, describe as well on The 74 what school accountability means today – and how it can be improved. Their essay includes lessons learned from The A Word: Accountability—The Dirty Word of Today’s Education Reform, a new Bush Institute series of interviews with respected education leaders.