Geovanny Ponce – Accountable Leaders Create Accountable Schools
Beginning his 18th year in education, Geovanny Ponce humbly believes: “I am still on the path to becoming the school leader my school needs.” This self-assessment is rooted in Geovanny’s awareness that excellent school leaders “don’t know everything and take it upon themselves to bridge those gaps.” A willingness to honestly assess, evaluate and make improvements where needed is critical for student and school growth. Leaders like Geovanny hold themselves to account for their students’ success and are therefore able to instill the pillars of an accountable education – data collection, regular assessment, meaningful evaluation, and courage to improve– that breed achievement.
Geovanny’s vision for success centers on his own mantra: “school culture will impact school achievement.” Building his leadership skills for 17 years around this idea, Geovanny has been able to lead Hartman Middle School in just over a year into an era of rigor and accountability that “maintains a culture of achievement.” Developing his leadership and human capital skills through AREL-affiliated Rice University Educational Entrepreneurship Program (REEP), Geovanny was equipped to build his school’s community around an implementation of rigorous and measureable systems that progressed Hartman from a subpar district rating, to being ranked one of Houston ISD’s top 10 schools, during his first year as principal.
Hartman’s success did not happen overnight - it required dedication and focused development from teachers and staff, and autonomous empowerment from Houston ISD. Propelled by these factors, Geovanny engaged in constant evaluation of “teachers, administrators and supporting staff, along with provided feedback” that helped move Hartman up 66 positions in the Children at Risk Report for the Greater City of Houston.
Broadly improving his school’s culture, Geovanny was able to target specific areas of needed improvement and put in place measures to augment academic success such as technology enhancements, refined strategies for engaging ESL families, and Saturday math and reading seminars for failing students. And the result was dramatic increases for Hartman’s students in all measured subjects over a year and half period: 15 percent in reading, 10 percent in science, 20 in social studies, 5 percent in writing, and 8 percent in math.
While Hartman demonstrated dramatic student growth during Geovanny’s inaugural year as the school’s leader, his development spans almost two decades. Geovanny began his journey as mechanical engineer – earning a degree from the University of Honduras. It was in this profession where his “teacher qualities emerged” and, for Geovanny, “the first indication God had more in store for me.”
Guided by a sense of urgency, Geovanny became inspired by the fact school culture impacts student achievement. Over the next 17 years, he continuously pushed himself, holding jobs such as campus network specialist and interim principal and earning degrees from the University of Houston and then REEP. Each of these experiences prepared Geovanny to be an exceptional school leader, instilling the value of “data assessment, self-assessment, and best practices,” that taught him to always “inspect what I expect” from teachers and students. Principal mentors showed Geovanny that “we acquire data in a sundry of ways” and that educators must use it to measure, provide feedback, target areas of improvement and promote student growth.
Using strategies like these, Geovanny contends that Houston ISD has been integral to Hartman’s success, as the district has empowered him to implement such systems to improve school culture and student achievement.
Geovanny’s determination, skill set, preparation, methods of accountability, and a supportive school district have all enabled him to positively impact Hartman’s students. Ever humble, Geovanny lives by the idea, “I do not have the power to change the world, but I have the power to change my school by providing effective leadership.” In being an excellent school leader, however, Geovanny has and will continue to change the worlds of the children who enter Hartman’s doors.
Share Geovanny Ponce's story using #SpotlightEDU
 As measured by the State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness for math and reading
 As measured by the State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness
By the Numbers: Why Do Principals Matter?
This week, the Bush Institute’s Alliance to Reform Education Leadership released two related major studies: research on evaluating principal preparation programs and the Principal Talent Management Framework, a guidebook for school districts to get, support, and keep great principals. So, why do principals matter? Principals may account for up to 25 percent of a school’s impact on student learning. Among school-related factors, principals are second only to classroom teaching when it comes to impact on student learning. In fact, a 2013 Education Next report found that “highly effective principals raise the achievement.” A principal’s impact is even greater in high poverty schools. The impact on achievement can be even greater in schools serving disadvantaged students, according to the same article above, which means it’s even more crucial to attract and retain high-quality principals in schools where the need may be greatest.
The Need for a Strong Principal Bench
A recent story of a principal who left the high school he successfully turned around in Newark, New Jersey illustrates how vulnerable turnaround reforms can be when the leader who implemented those reforms moves on.
Data on School Leaders: What’s in Your System?
We know good school leaders matter. Knowing how to prepare school leaders to be effective can transform the leadership landscape. To better understand the effects that principals from select innovative preparation programs are having on student achievement, the George W. Bush Institute and American Institutes for Research are conducting a two-year principal preparation evaluation study for release this fall. Working on this study, we have encountered and overcome several challenges, but one of the most surprising being districts’ lack of consistent, reliable, and readily available data on principal training and experience. Few districts were able to identify the name of the program or institution where each of their principals was trained and certified. Few knew how many years of experience principals had or how much or what type of internal professional development or training principals may have experienced. These are the very data that school districts should be collecting an